The
tables compare the differences in expenditure-income indicators as percentage
of GDP recorded in three Asian economies. Write a report. Make comparisons
wherever possible/necessary. You may spend 20 mnts on this.
Expenditure as
percentage of GDP set aside for wildlife conservation
|
Nations
|
1995
|
2000
|
2005
|
2010
|
|
|
1.1
|
2.3
|
2.5
|
4.4
|
|
|
2.2
|
2.2
|
4.3
|
4.0
|
|
|
1.1
|
2.0
|
3.3
|
3.0
|
Contribution from
wildlife to GDP
|
Nations
|
1995
|
2000
|
2005
|
2010
|
|
|
2.2
|
2.4
|
5.0
|
5.5
|
|
|
2.3
|
2.5
|
6.0
|
6.0
|
|
|
2.0
|
2.5
|
6.6
|
6.0
|
Ajaypeesdoc.30.1.013. 5am
Task II
Poor
nations with huge wildlife population are forced spend sizeable amounts on wild
life protection. But the benefits of which in terms of environment and ecology
are being shared by the rich as well.
How far do you agree or disagree with the view that the rich must help
the poor maintain wildlife?
No comments:
Post a Comment