Tuesday, September 2, 2014

Many poor nations encourage rich countries to make investments in their (former’s) manufacturing sector. This FDI, foreign direct investment, is supported and opposed by many. • What could be their arguments for and against this poor-rich association in manufacturing? Foreign Direct Investment, (FDI), from rich nations to poor ones, has always been a topic of discussion all over the world. Obviously, supporting and opposing camps could have their own points to prove their respective stances. Let me see what those points may be. 44 words. The supporting school of though might hold the view that, when money comes to work, it would generate greater money. This may be made clear looking at the manufacturing sector that spins money across the world. The second thing could be the belief that it would generate huge employment possibilities as this sector always calls for great numbers of people - skilled, tech savvy and professionally qualified- alike. Besides this, technology transfer, from the rich to poor, could be a great advantage as this is what keeps the globalized world functioning. Global market access is another plus. 96 words Moving on to the other camp, it may hold the view that FDI is an encroachment on a nation’s financial freedom. That is, foreign investors might dictate financial terms and conditions which would not be up-to likes of their poor counterparts. In addition to this, the presence of foreign manufacturers might pose a potential threat to the national counterparts that might take a beating in the long run. Yet another stance would be this that these foreign investors would eye greatly on sizeable returns and they might throw the national concerns to the winds. 94 words. Objectively observing the views, it may be concluded that FDI could have many takers depending on its positives. I think, allowing selective investment is likely to do more favours for the poor. 32 words 266words Ajaypeesdoc Try to see the write-up in the following angles: • Lexical Resource: • Cohesion and coherence: • Grammar, structure and usage: • Task fulfillment:

No comments:

Post a Comment