Visit. www.jpsukham.blogspot.com
1. Since maintaining water security to people is the sole responsibility of the State, some people suggest that those who use much more water than what they need should be taxed heavily so as to make them come to terms with the need for preserving water.

How far do you agree or disagree with this statement?


2. Since water is precious for survival of all flora and fauna, there are people who claim that wasting water in any way is a crime against nature and humanity, and such people be punished in such a way that others pick up cues for wise water management.

Visit. www.jpsukham.blogspot.com

To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?


3. That one has got enough or more than enough water in hiss/her premises does not give one any freedom to waste or mismanage water; rather the government should identify such water-rich people and make them share the surplus stock with the needy around.

How far would such an arrangement solve water crisis?



4. It is being felt world over that rain water harvesting is the best alternative to ensure water security round the year. However, rain water harvesting initiatives do not catch up with people across the social spectrum.

Look at the reasons for such a disparity in people’s attitude to water?
What effects does it have on society in general?
Visit. www.jpsukham.blogspot.com



5. Deep-well water harvesting done both by affluent individuals is found to be taking ground water levels to far too down. This makes ordinary people reel under water-scarce living conditions. So there should be blanket ban on deep-well water harvesting.
Visit. www.jpsukham.blogspot.com
How far can you support this argument?
What all ways can you suggest to make water available to the needy?