A few different looks at films as an entertainer and a reforming instrument.

Film as an entertainer is often criticized as a medium which is able to generate huge false impressions in the minds of the young. This is reason enough for some to argue that films that distort the young need to be banned from screening.

To what extent do you agree or disagree with this argument.

Film as an entertainer is often criticized as a medium which is able to generate huge false impressions in the minds of the young. This is reason enough for some to argue that films that distort the young need to be banned from screening.

Argue for and against this view.

Film as an entertainer is often criticized as a medium which is able to generate huge false impressions in the minds of the young. This is reason enough for some to argue that films that distort the young need to be banned from screening.

Do you think films need to concentrate more on moulding the youth than on entertaining the public?

Film as an entertainer is often criticized as a medium which is able to generate huge false impressions in the minds of the young. This is reason enough for some to argue that films that distort the young need to be banned from screening.

Why is film able to make lasting wrong impressions in the young when compared to other forms of pastimes?