Saturday, January 21, 2012

Four approaches

1.

People who dedicate their whole life for scientific innovations are not so much in the limelight as those who are in the field of art and literature.

• Why is it so?
• Do you think creative artistes deserve more attention than others?


2.

The world has come a long way in terms of scientific and technological advancements, and these development offer huge possibilities for better human sustenance. However, the need for art and literary forms is always on the rise.

• Do you think modern man can do without art and literary forms?
• Try to see why there is always rising need for art and literary forms?


3.

Great artistes of all ages are able to influence people of all ages. But the story is not so when it comes to scientists and technocrats.

• Why is this disparity?
• What is it that makes people powerful enough to influence others?

Ajaypeesdoc.22.1.012
4.

Though artistes of a given society are held in high esteem, some people think that they (artistes) do not hold much in store for their immediate society in terms of development.

• How far do you agree or disagree with this?


5.

Some hold the view that governments need to extent financial aid to those who are engaged in creeds like art, dance, literature and the like. However, there are others who say that it is not necessary as they do not do much to a society.

Which view do you support, and state why?

No comments: