Each country is blessed with good sports persons who raise their own land's name newer heights of fame. Hence it is the responsibility of the government to fund sports much more than what private sectors can do. I strongly agree to this view. Sports is not only a source of entertainment but also a great employment provider many who are directly or indirectly associated with sports. Those who have got talents can shine in this field, our course with great hard work. But, at the initial stages, most of the junior players cannot move forward until and unless someone sponsors them. If the government does not give any fund, only the rich can afford such expenses by themselves and the aftereffect is the real loss of excellent players. For example, most of the unnoticed beginners have taken much name and fame after years of training in sports like cricket and football. When we look at the private enterprises, it is true that they earn a lot by using the image of sports stars. Actually, they select the sportsmen who are in the limelight. For example, after a cricket tournament the 'man of the match' always gets handful opportunities for advertisements and commercial programmes. In fact, they get these offers only for a short period. Most often they do not get any opportunities from private sector if they are in poor form. In short, perpetual and persistent support can be extended from the government sector which is really helpful for the growth of sports, and thus the country can become more famous. This initiative cannot be seen in private enterprises, and hence people who think that private businesses can promote sports more than government do not see the full game but part of it.. TOTAL270 words