Wednesday, October 20, 2010

Some social scientists say that poor nations need to enact a law enforcing minimum number of children a family can have, and thereby enabling the State to withdraw support for the additional child/children in matters like education, employment and healthcare.
Essay 010
How far can you agree with such a law?
Do you think it is right to withdraw support for all additional children?

It is a matter of great concern that population is increasing phenomenally in third world nations. In such a state of affairs, a law on population control is timely, and I find it agreeable to a greater extent. But, I cannot support the provision that the State can deny support to extra child/children.

Rising population is no good anymore. There are several different measures being implemented to curtail population growth. But the impact of such measures is not visible either. Therefore, a law on minimum number of children is timely and worth considering. Firstly, when people come to understand that State wouldn’t support additional children, there would be change of attitude towards having more children. And there will be visible changes in all walks of life thanks to stabilizing population rates. For example, this law is already in force in China, and there are evidences to prove that it works in there.

However, I find it difficult to support State’s denying support to extra child/children. My one and only argument against this idea is this, that the factors that make a family have a certain number of children are more powerful than the provisions of a law. For example, social status, gender preferences, personal likes, family obligations and so on would make parents go for more children. Undoubtedly, such children would come to millions and no welfare State can ignore their well being. Therefore, simply cannot endorse such a provision.

So, to conclude it, a law on minimum number of children is good in many ways, but the State has to support additional children conditionally. If this is done, a law on small family norm would have greater number of takers in the days to come.

280 words
Ajaypeesdoc

Monday, October 18, 2010

Five questions 18.10.010


1. Studies on population growth indicate that it is not the rise in the number of births that causes concern; rather it is the unprecedented rise in the number of years older people happens to live that causes real concern.

How genuine is this concern in your point of view?
Do you think living longer is a liability to the society?



3. Deforestation, ozone depletion, ground water fall and pollutions of different types threaten the planet in more ways than one, and human action is said to the most potential reason for all these.

Discuss it.

4. Traffic related problems could be sorted out to greater extent if governments could impose a ceiling on the number of cars a manufacturer can sell in a particular market.

· Argue for and against this statement.



5. Imposing exorbitant taxes on people who use natural and energy resources indiscriminately could be a viable solution to manage the emerging resource crunch.

· How feasible is this idea your opinion?
· What all ways can you suggest to tide over this problem?
The graph is about the value of companies: Fill in the gaps with the phrases given down the answer.

The graph presents ………1……………of three companies selling farming equipments every five years and …………2……for the year 2015.

It is clear that Greenacres ……3……………from 1960 to 1990. Its initial worth of 2000,000 dollars ………4…………..4000,000 in 30 years. However, …………5………..soon and its value scaled down to its 1960 position in 2000. Anyway, there…………6……., and it touched 350,000 dollars mark in 2010. If it keeps this tempo, …………7………above 4000,000 dollars in 2015.

With a starting value of mere 500,000 dollars, Carsons Ltd………8……, with slight fluctuations in between, and it is projected to touch 1500,000 dollar mark in 2015,…………9…………..growth.

And, finally, Farm Implements, which started trading only in 1980, …………………of 1000,000 dollars. ……………………..witnessed steady growth and it fared almost equally well with Greenacres’ value in 2010; around 3500,000. It ……………3500,000 mark in 2015.

When Farm Implements and Carsons Ltd. ……………..over the years, Greenacres’ value spiraled down ……………..and ……………..ahead of all others.

had an opening value, the values in US dollars, fared well, its value is projected to go,
it suffered a great loss, their projected value, recorded a steady growth,
got doubled to, was quick recovery, recording a three times’, kept on growing, Successive periods, stands poised to cross, had a constant growth, once in between,

Tuesday, October 5, 2010

Right information on healthcare will make great differences in people’s attitude towards health and well-being, but limitless access to medical information will do more harm than good.
Essay 001
Discuss both the views.

Getting rightly informed is of course good. But getting excessive information is not only bad, but it is dangerous also. When right knowledge on healthcare helps people achieve better life and well-being, excessive access makes it highly dangerous.

Getting informed is entirely different from getting rightly informed. When it comes to awareness on healthcare, this is extremely important because, medical know-how can make people lead healthy lives. For example, people will develop a tendency to be on guard against infectious diseases; they may make periodic check ups mandatory; they may follow healthy lifestyle practices; and some may even make it a point that they live a life in tune with what their knowledge on their health dictates. In short, appropriate knowledge on healthcare will change the very way people look at their health and well being.

On the contrary, if medical information is dispensed without any limit, there is danger. For example, people who have got huge stock of knowledge on medicines, diseases and treatments may go for self medication; some may try over medication and some others may even go for poor medication out of fear. Apart from all these, wrongly informed people have a tendency to do doctor hopping and demand for diagnostic procedures, thinking that they are suffering from severe medical conditions. Needless to say, all these practices are dangerous in a healthcare perspective.

To be precise, being aware is a blessing, but being too much aware is a bane. However, since we cannot stay away from this knowledge flooding, we all need to be intelligent enough to identify what information is needed, and what is not, especially with medical knowledge.

275 Words
Ajaypeesdoc
While rising health education among people keeps them highly conscious of their health, extremely free availability of medical information through various media, on the other hand, keeps people highly anxious about their health.
Essay 002
How far is this true in your place?

Information is both powerful and dangerous. This is more so when it is a matter of access to medical education and virtual availability of medical information. While the former keeps people empowered, the other leaves them worried. This is true in my place too.

It is a fact that health education is on the rise. This is contributed more by media than by other social agencies. Anyhow, people, who are aware of health, are likely to be on guard against diseases, and they are able lead lives according to the dictates of their knowledge. For example, in our place great many people are found to be doing for periodic check ups and following healthy life style practices like following fitness regime, drinking boiled water and so on. Actually, this is a welcome development thanks to rising health education.

Unfortunately, today people are inundated by information on diseases, symptoms, medicines, diagnostics and surgical procedures. This is actually dangerous. This knowledge, instead of making them conscious of their health, leaves them at tender hooks. For example, people with too much health education may find themselves hypochondriacs. They may even go for forced medications. For example, in our place, some people who have got great access to medical knowledge feel afraid of their health status. It is their excessive knowledge on health that makes them anxious. This is a reality in my place.

In short, unless we are able to identify what information makes us conscious of our health and what makes us anxious, any information on health is dangerous. I hope everybody takes note, including the people of my place.

265 Words
Ajaypeesdoc
Health consciousness among people is on the rise thanks to education and free access to medical information of all types. Some people feel that it is a welcome development, whereas there are others who feel that it is dangerous.
Essay 003
How good or bad is rising health consciousness in your opinion?

Information is both powerful and dangerous. This is more so when it is a matter of access to medical education which keeps people’s health consciousness on the high. What I feel is that rising health consciousness is good, but, unless it is wisely managed, it will be dangerous.

Compared to olden times, people today are well informed of health and the risks involved in following unhealthy lifestyle practices. This is thanks to the availability of medical information and access to the same. Actually, it is a welcome development, because many people are prepared to go for periodic medical check ups and follow diet and fitness regimes in order to lead a healthier and longer life. For example, the number of those who spend time and money for health is much higher today than it was in the past. This is really encouraging.

However, there is another side to it. Rising health consciousness at times keeps people more anxious than conscious of their health. For example, access to information on diseases, medicines and treatments makes people worry too much about their health. As a result, some people go for self medication, whereas some others go for over medication or poor medication. There are others who go doctor shopping and demand for diagnostic procedures and treatments. This is the dangerous side of rising health consciousness.

In short, any information is good if wisely made use of. This is more so with medical information and health consciousness. Needless to say, it is a blessing to be rightly aware of health and wellness, but it is dangerous too, if not properly managed.

265 Words
Ajaypeesdoc
Is it the rising health consciousness that makes people highly anxious of their health? Or, it is limitless and free access to medical knowledge that makes them so?
Essay 004
Approach these questions objectively.

The mounting health consciousness among people is a positive development if we look at it objectively. On the other hand, virtual access to medical information may make people more anxious than conscious of their health.

It is a fact that health education is on the rise. This is contributed more by media than by other social agencies. Anyhow, people, who are aware of health, are likely to be on guard against diseases, and they are able lead lives according to the dictates of their knowledge. For example, in our place great many people are found to be doing for periodic check ups and following healthy life style practices like following fitness regime, drinking boiled water and so on. Actually, this is a welcome development and it is hard to say it would make people anxious of their health.

Unfortunately, today people are flooded with information on diseases, medicines, diagnostics and medical researches and developments. This is actually dangerous. This knowledge, instead of making them conscious of their health, leaves them at tender hooks. For example, people with too much medical knowledge may find themselves confused and doubtful. As a result, they may even go for solicited medication. For example, some people always feel afraid of their health status. It is due to the excessive access to medical knowledge they enjoy that makes them anxious, not the mounting health consciousness.

In short, unless people are able to identify the fine line that lies between health consciousness and medical knowledge, both the developments will be counter productive. Right health consciousness is good, but too much medical knowledge is dangerous.

270 words
Ajaypeesdoc
There is an argument that extremely free availability of medical information and literature will do more harm than good to people.
Essay 005
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this?

Getting informed is of course good. But getting excessive information is not only bad, but it is dangerous also. This is true with regards to medical knowledge. Unless intellegenctly managed, excessive access to medical knowledge may make things worse.

When it comes to awareness on healthcare, it is extremely important that people make use of their awareness for their well being, because wrong impressions on medical knowledge may harm people. On the other hand, if people are conscious of the benefits involved in medical knowledge, they will develop a tendency to be on guard against infectious diseases; they may make periodic check ups mandatory; they may follow healthy lifestyle practices; and some may even make it a point that they live life beautifully healthily.

On the contrary, if medical information is dispensed without any limit, there is danger. For example, people who have got great access to medical knowledge literature may go for self medication; some may try over medication and some others may ignore medication or opt for poor medication out of fear. Apart from all these, over informed people may have a tendency to do doctor shopping and demand for diagnostic and medical procedures. Needless to say, excessive access to medial knowledge and literature is likely to more harm than good.

To be precise, being aware is a blessing, but being too much aware is a bane. This is what I feel with regard to virtual access to health care knowledge. Unless wisely managed, it will be more harmful than beneficial.


255 Words
Ajaypeesdoc

Monday, October 4, 2010

Health consciousness and access to medical information
Visit. www.jpsukham.blogspot.com

1.

While rising health education among people keeps them highly conscious of their health, extremely free availability of medical and diagnostic information through various media, on the other hand, keeps people highly anxious about their health.

How far is this true in your place?


2.

Is it rising health consciousness that makes people highly anxious of their health? Or, it is free information on medical and diagnostics that makes them so?

Approach these questions objectively.


3.

There is an argument that extremely free availability of medical information and literature will do more harm than good to people.

To what extent do you agree or disagree with this?


4.

Health consciousness among people is on the rise thanks to education and free access to medical information of all types. Some people feel that it is a welcome development, whereas there are others who feel that it is dangerous.

How good or bad is rising health consciousness in your opinion?



Right information on healthcare will make great difference in people’s attitude towards health and well-being, but limitless access to medical information will do more harm than good.

Discuss it.

Visit. www.jpsukham.blogspot.com

Saturday, October 2, 2010

Some social scientists are of the opinion that children are likely to understand the need for equal gender participation in real life if their parents are prepared to allow their children to actively participate in all domestic chores.
Essay 051
How do you look at this opinion?
Do you think gender participation is of some value?

Equal gender engaging is not likely to take place unless there is initiative from the family itself. This may be by engaging children in all domestic duties. Obviously, gender participation is of greater value today than ever, and our social scientists’ view sounds genuine to me too.

Achieving equal gender participation is not that easy as we think. Still, hopefully, if we could start from families - it is families that inculcate gender preferences in children - there will be light at the end of the tunnel. For example; parents can instill lessons of gender participation in children. This can be done by engaging them in all domestic activities irrespective of the nature of work. This will change the attitude from the grassroots itself, and this change will later turn out to be the order of the day.

It is obvious that gender participation has great value now. Today, life is taken mostly in terms of time, money and material. If these things are to be achieved up-to the expectations of all, there needs gender participation. For example, a nuclear family atmosphere demands mutual gender engaging, for working environment is 24x7, double income is the need of the hour and life is more a matter of competition than one of anything else. Here what makes things smoother is gender participation.

So what is it all in short? Parents need to understand the fact that their children need to engage equally well so that their life will be better. This needs to start from home itself. All good things need to start from home. So is the need for equal gender participation.

265 Words
Ajaypeesdoc

Wednesday, September 29, 2010

1.
Men and women are entirely different in several different ways. Therefore, gender parity is not at all possible, whereas they are so contributing each other that gender participation is very much possible.
Discuss both the views.

This discussion is as old as man. Still it remains heated as well. However, when I look at the first view, I find it reasonable and the second one on gender participation is really worth trying. This will do great service to both the genders per se.

2.
Some people believe that equal gender participation is able to do much more for the general human wellbeing than what gender equality per se is said to be able to do.

To what extent do you agree with this view?

There are different opinions on what makes general human life better: is it gender parity or participation? I for one am of the opinion that, in these times of opportunities and cooperation, it is better to be participating than claiming to be at par, the latter does not sound possible.


3.
Though much is said and spoken about gender equality across the world, the fact remains that it is not gender equality that is going to make changes in human well being but better gender participation.

How far can you support this idea?

Gender equality is a bone of contention around the world. However, of late, there is a fresh look at this issue that concludes that it is gender participation, not gender parity that makes real changes in human life. I find the idea worth supporting to a greater extent.

4.
There is a strong belief that boys and girls pick up the basics of gender disparity from their homes.

How far is this true in your place?

Gender consciousness is something genetic. However, when it comes to the basic of gender disparity and parity, family does have a greater role than anything else. Since lessons from the family get ingrained deeper in everyone, gender parity does not look possible.

5.
Some social scientists are of the opinion that children are likely to understand the need for equal gender participation in real life if their parents are prepared to allow their children to actively participate in all domestic chores.

How do you look at this opinion?
Do you think gender participation is of some value?

Equal gender engaging is not likely to take place unless there is initiative from family itself. This may be by engaging children in all domestic duties. Obviously, gender participation is of greater value today than ever, and our social scientists’ view sounds genuine to me too.
Visit. www.jpsukham.blogspot.com

Tuesday, September 28, 2010

1. It is argued that right to employment is a fundamental right and, if a State fails to engage its educated and productive manpower in some worthwhile income generating mode, it may be deemed as a case of violation of human rights.
· Argue for and against this view.

The argument that right to employment is a fundamental right is well founded because the educated are the ones who keep the nation growing. So their employment is the responsibility of the State. However, opinions differ when we take it as a violation of rights if the state fails in it.

2. Promoting and protecting the health of women is of greater importance in terms of social welfare not only for the health of present generation but also for all the generations to come.
· Substantiate this argument with evidence to support it.
· How can we promote and protect the health of women?

Social welfare involves several factors, and most important one among them is the health status of people. In this respect, ensuring women’s health is more important than anything else. This is for today and for tomorrow, too. Of course, there are ways to achieve this goal.

3. While conventional games were physically, socially and intellectually charging, new generation games are found to be the other way round; making participants passive and enervating.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view?

Games of olden times had many dimensions; social, physical and so on. Such games, naturally, fostered many faculties in several different ways. However, what we have today in the name of games, to a greater extent, are not so involving as to make the participants any better.

4. Many people feel that development is likely to erode the cultural values of a place no matter where the development takes place.
· How far do you agree or disagree with this?
· Prove your points with examples taken from your life or surroundings.

Since change is natural and development is but change, the possibility for change in cultural values too is possible in today’s fast paced world. It is true to a great extent that, irrespective of place and time, development changes values.

5. Many people feel that development is likely to erode the cultural values of a place no matter where the development takes place.
· How far do you agree or disagree with this?
· Prove your points with examples taken from your life or surroundings.

Since change is natural and development is but change, the possibility for change in cultural values too is possible in today’s fast paced world. It is true to a great extent that, irrespective of place and time, development changes values.

6. Better teacher-student understanding and student-friendly academic ambience will be able to remove corporal punishment from schools for ever.
How far do you agree or disagree with this?

There is saying: “spare the rode and spoil the child”. But studies show that sparing the rod may save a child, not spoil one. Since this finding goes exactly in line with the idea that teacher-student-friendly academic milieu will spare the rod for ever, I for one stand for such a student-friendly school.

7. Tourism is a platform on which distance and diversity work as instruments that promotes unity and understanding among people - irrespective of their being what they are and where they are from.
· How far are you going to endorse this statement?

Tourism has always been a strong force that has promoted cooperation and understanding among the populace for ages. What ever is the tourism a place promotes, the force behind it has always been distance and diversity. This is what is going on today too. That is what I feel.

8. Starting up a career much earlier is taken by some as highly advantageous, whereas there are others who take it the other way round.

· How advantageous or disadvantageous is it in your opinion?

In these times of career opportunities, it is rather easy to say that early career is better. However, this write up makes an attempt to find out what all advantages and disadvantages early career selection offers people today.

9. High-rise buildings are springing up like mushrooms even in semi-urban areas of developing nations, and this spurt in real estate sector can be attributed to many factors
What do you think are the factors that lead to this trend?
· What impacts does it have on the environment?

It is true that there is a spurt in infrastructure development, especially in real estate, and it can be seen everywhere in developing nations. This boom can be attributed to many factors, and the same has far reaching impacts on the environment.

10 Many celebrities, like film-stars and sports icons, are found to be endorsing consumer products and services, both harmful and useful, marketed by multinational companies. This tendency promotes unhealthy shopping practices.
How far is it justifiable that celebrities go for paid endorsements?
What are the impacts of the resultant unhealthy shopping practices?
Marketing organizations adopt many tricks to promote their sales. One such trick is celebrity endorsement. This is very common now. But it is really hard to justify them go for paid endorsements. It creates unhealthy shopping tendencies, and the same will lead to many consequences.

11. Though aqua-tourism prospects are widely being exploited world over, it is a fact that this tourism is doing much more harm than good to the people and ecology. So it needs to be discouraged.

· How far do you agree or disagree with this?
It is a fact that aqua tourism, as a tourism genre, is doing great harm to people and ecology since it operates on water. So the need for discouraging it is important, but we cannot simply ignore its potential though.

12. There is an argument that, since every child is unique with different talents and interests, making all children follow a uniform courseware in school is to be discouraged.

Argue for and against this.
Giving right education to the young is a complex affair. When it comes to individual talents and tastes, this becomes more complex. So it is natural that there are differing views about the feasibility of following a uniform syllabus for all students.

Monday, September 27, 2010

Falling oil levels pose a great threat to the world in general. In order offset this burgeoning issue, some people suggest that rationing fuel is a good idea so that oil consumption can be cut down drastically.
Essay 071
How do you look at rationing of fuel?
What are the problems you see in its commercial implementation?


Not many would deny the fact that oil saved is oil produced. Therefore, saving oil or keeping the oil levels across the world steady is of paramount importance. In this respect, rationing fuel in my opinion is excellent idea, though there are a few practical difficulties.

Rationing is a system through which individuals are allowed get certain quantity of fuel for a stipulated period. This idea is excellent in more ways than one. Primarily, it makes people extremely conscious of the need for managing oil resources wisely. Secondly, wastage by way of unnecessary burning done by youngsters who take pleasure ride just for fun. Thirdly, oil ration cards would mean that certain measure of oil is assured to everyone round the year. And finally, reduced consumption will lead to reduced production which in turn would keep the oil levels from falling to alarming low levels.

All these finer sides notwithstanding, we cannot ignore the problems when it is commercially implemented. First of all, issuing fuel cards to all licensed automobile users is a huge task involving great amount of investment, infrastructure and technology. This situation is further aggravated by the fact that, if there is a technical snag, the whole distribution network would come to a stand still. A nation cannot afford to be halted by such a failure. And, finally, profit driven oil firms may not be happy with limited sales.

Looking at both the aspects, it may be concluded that rationing fuel is the need of the hour as the system is bound to make the planet breathe easy with enough oil for the coming generation. Of course, the problems need to be seriously looked into.

280 words
Ajaypeesdoc

Sunday, September 26, 2010


Some social scientists say that poor nations need to enact a law enforcing minimum number of children a family can have, and thereby enabling the State to withdraw support for the additional child/children in matters like education, employment and healthcare.
Essay 110
How far can you agree with such a law?
Do you think it is right to withdraw support for all additional children?

It is a matter of great concern that population is increasing phenomenally in third world nations. In such a state of affairs, a law on population control is timely, and I find it agreeable to a greater extent. But, I cannot support the provision that the State can deny support to extra child/children.

Rising population is no good anymore. There are several different measures being implemented to curtail population growth. But the impact of such measures is not visible either. Therefore, a law on minimum number of children is timely and worth considering. Firstly, when people come to understand that State wouldn’t support additional children, there would be change of attitude towards having more children. And there will be visible changes in all walks of life thanks to stabilizing population rates. For example, this law is already in force in China, and there are evidences to prove that it works in there.

However, I find it difficult to support State’s denying support to extra child/children. My one and only argument against this idea is this, that the factors that make a family have a certain number of children are more powerful than the provisions of a law. For example, social status, gender preferences, personal likes, family obligations and so on would make parents go for more children. Undoubtedly, such children would come to millions and no welfare State can ignore their well being. Therefore, simply cannot endorse such a provision.

So, to conclude it, a law on minimum number of children is good in many ways, but the State has to support additional children conditionally. If this is done, a law on small family norm would have greater number of takers in the days to come.

280 words
Ajaypeesdoc












Thursday, September 23, 2010

List of environmental problems:
Today the earth’s environment is in a sorry state. Wherever one looks, one encounters pollution. Forests are disappearing. The green patches in the city are being replaced by concrete buildings. Wastes are being dumped indiscriminately. Water is too toxic to drink. The air is unfit to breathe in. Global warming has become a menacing issue. There is a question mark over the survival of life on the earth. The human race is at the brink of a self-created disaster. Truly there is a surfeit of environmental problems today.There are a number of significant environmental problems today. They are as follows:
Loss of forest cover. Forest are being cut down for timber, construction and for obtaining extra agricultural land.
Air pollution. This is caused by polluting industries and vehicular traffic. Burning incinerators, furnaces and stoves cause it. Wind is responsible for spreading air pollution. The Ozone layer has been damaged because of the use of CFC’s (Chlorofluorocarbons) which are used in a number of industrial, commercial, and household applications.
Water pollution. Industries and factories release toxic wastes into the water. Leakage from oil tankers causes pollution of the sea. Pesticides and fertilizers also cause water pollution. Sewage released by cities into water bodies. It is predicted that there will be conflicts among nations because water will become scarce.
Overpopulation. The increase in human population increases demands for the water resources. More land is required for housing. There is increased demand for food for which more agricultural land is needed. More fuel is required. More automobiles cause more pollution.
Erosion of soil. When trees and plants are destroyed that causes increase in soil erosion.
Climate change and Global warming. Human activities cause climate change like increase in temperature. Many animal and plant species may be destroyed by climate change.
Introduction of genetically modified species. Humans are tinkering with the genes of various plants and animals. We do not fully understand how the introduction of new species will affect the environment.
When human aggression pressurizes the Planet, his fellow beings bear the brunt. The most unfortunate thing is, if our bees we find next flower dies out totally, human life will be impossible within five years’ time. But even if all humans die out, not even a single other species will suffer. They all will live happily ever after. Man is the most dependant species on the planet. Shouldn’t we mend our ways with our environment?