There is a general argument that State is supposed to provide security to the life and property of its citizens. But there is another view that citizens too have the responsibility to look after his life and property.
How do you look at these two view points? Jaypee. 10/12/08
· Providing security is huge responsibility
· Security is a feeling that gets generated by many factors.
· It includes the protection of life and property of the people.
· Since it’s a common system, the job needs to be shared.
· Citizens cannot sit assured that the state will provide him
Supposed is to provide.
In general terms, it is true, because:
Firstly, laws, rules, their implementation need a system
Secondly, the security of nation is in the hand of the defense.
Thirdly, every individual is weak when taken individually.
His concerns need to be taken care of by the state, especially when his personal freedom and safety is threatened.
This is more so in a democracy with huge population. He has a duty too.
Citizens have to share it.
One the other hand, every citizen is supposed to protect himself.
Primarily, personal care is personal and state has limitations.
Since population is huge, state may not be able to do
Secondly, everyone needs to cooperate with the state..when in need
Thirdly, there are so many things citizens themselves can do.
State is constituted by the people. State is people.
Concl:
· Freedom is responsibility. One has to show a sense responsibility
· State is collective identity constituted by the people.
· People cannot get themselves isolated from the state
· State is people. People have to have a share in everything, including security to the life and property.
10/12/08. 10.30 pm Always believe that every essay offers you a chance to test your writing skill. For more essays and answers. Visit: www.jpsukham.blogspot.com or search for: Vaatupura on google.
No comments:
Post a Comment