1. Some say culture exists through a common native language
while others say culture is self-standing and it does not necessarily need a
common language.
·
How
right are these two views on culture in your opinion?
It is a little hard tell
apart the relationship between culture and the language of a culture. Anyway,
culture is transported through a language, but it is not to say that there must
be a common language all the time.
To begin with culture as
such, it is not that easy to confine this abstract idea into a smaller set of
words. However, it is words most of the time that keep culture going and
enlivened. For example, people’s contributions to their life are being recorded
in a language and the same is carried down to the coming generation.
Let me clarify it with an
example. In our culture, it is expected that elders are respected and women are
revered and children are nurtured with utmost care. This idea is written in holy
scripts, referred to too often, spoken by people, and children are taught so. But
the thing is that there can be several languages to get this job done. Again in
Indian culture, food, whatever it may be, is taken as divine and this is same
throughout the country.
Let me come to the second
idea that culture is self-standing. In a multi-lingual populace same cultural
nuances will be transported in several different mediums. Here I must add that
there are a certain cultural things that do not need a language at all. Music,
dance, some performing arts and fine arts are far more expressed and
appreciated than spoken or read out. They just exist.
In short, language is very
much involved in carrying a culture forward, but there are some cultural
elements that do not need any language at all. They can be on their own. Or,
they have their own language, I would say. The two views on culture are
solid.
290 words
Ajaypeesdoc. 18.11.013
No comments:
Post a Comment