Sunday, February 20, 2011

Five questions on health hazards
1.
Habit forming health hazards like tobacco products and alcoholic beverages are legally sold, and the revenue these substances brings in is so huge that many governments are not ready to look at the loss of human resource and productivity these hazards cause.

In this context, it is argued that governments should fund for the rehabilitation of those who get addicted to these.

How far do you agree or disagree with this view?
Ajaypeesdoc. 21.2.011

2.
The revenue generated by health hazards like tobacco products and alcoholic beverages is so huge that many governments turn a blind eye to the social damages these hazards leave behind.

So some people are of the opinion that these hazards are State sponsored social evils.

• How far do you agree or disagree with this view?


3.

Some social scientists say governments very well can do without the revenue generated out of health hazards like tobacco and alcoholic beverages, but there are people who hold the opposite view right.

• Which view do you support and state why?

Ajaypeesdoc. 21.2.011
4.

The revenue generated by health hazards like tobacco and alcoholic beverages is not big enough to offset the damages these hazards inflict on human society.

• How do you look at this view?
• Do you think governments should do away with these hazards?

5.

A society free from tobacco products and alcoholic beverages is much freer from almost all other social evils.

• How best can you support this view?

No comments: