Five questions:

1.

Many governments resort to rewarding sports icons with enormous cash benefits when they (the latter) achieve something remarkable. But this is not so when it comes to achievements in arts, literature, science, medicine and the like.

• How justifiable is it to honour sports icons with money?
• Do you think governments need to follow this practice in other areas too?


2.

Some people believe that monetary rewards would keep sports persons motivated to do their best whereas there are others who feel that it is name and fame that do the job.

• Which view do you support and state why?


3.

Some people believe that monetary rewards would keep sports persons motivated to do their best whereas there are others who feel that it is name and fame that does the job.

• How powerful is money in keeping sports persons motivated?
• Do you think name and fame does have a role to play in this?


4.

Considering the efforts and dedication that sportspersons show towards their creed, it is right to honour them with huge monitory rewards upon remarkable achievements.

• How far do you agree or disagree with this view?

29.11.011
5.

Though sportspersons do not seem to be doing much to the general well being of the public, they are given enormous benefits and rewards upon achievements.

• How right it is to say that sports icon don’t do much to public?
• How far do you endorse the rewards and honours they receive?