Over dependence on
life-easing gadgets and devices puts greater impacts on human intellectual and
emotional capabilities. Some say this concern is genuine whereas some others
say it is unfair to blame such technologies.
How
do you respond to these two views?
What
we do and how log we what has great bearing on our intellectual and emotional
well being. As a matter of fact there is a strong point in the concerns some
people raise on rising time of gadgets. However, pointing an accusing finger at
technology is unfair.
The
major point towards the concern is that our actions get reflected in our
emotions and intelligence. Human intelligence, for instance, gets sharper if it
is extensively used. For example, how many of us can recollect our own personal
numbers, or make a few simple calculations without a calculator? So is the case
with our emotions. They go warmer and stronger when they are shared or received.
If
these two things do not happen for a long time, obviously, our intelligence would get blunter and our emotions may fail to
emote. This is what happens when depend too much on e. machines. This may be either
for conveying a note of congratulations or thanks, expressing condolences,
registering a protest or whatever. For
example, hugging a person, patting on one’s shoulders, wiping one’s tears and giving
company to laughter and the like should be done in person. So E. tools can damage
what is inherently human.
All
these negative impacts notwithstanding, it does not sound good to blame
electronic gargets that actually make human easier. Who would deny the fact all
such devices are for man’s better life? The problem, therefore, is the way we
use them. Instead of making them our servants, we succumb to their temptations,
and we render ourselves to be mere tools.
Responding
to the two views, it may be concluded that the concern is of greater
significance, but I would like to leave technologies on their own. In my
opinion, we must be intelligent enough to call the shots when it comes to e.
devices and gadgets.
Ajaypeesdoc. 280 words
6.pm 4.2.013
No comments:
Post a Comment